Manage scholarship applications fairly and transparently
Students apply online, the system checks the documents and scores them, the committee decides — every step on record.
The Student Scholarship Support System moves the scholarship process of foundations and institutions from paper to digital. Applications are received online, documents are verified and scored automatically against the institution's own criteria. Committee decisions are recorded with their reasoning, and payment plans are tracked in the system.
Before and after
- Applications arrive on paper and as email attachments
- Scoring lives in each member's own notes
- The reasoning behind a decision cannot be traced
- Payment tracking in a separate sheet
- Applications and documents online and verified
- Scoring automatic against defined criteria
- A mandatory reasoning field keeps decisions auditable
- Payment plans are tracked in the system
How it works
Three steps, no technical detail.
The student applies online
They fill in the form and upload documents. If something is missing the system says so; the application is not lost.
The system scores it
It ranks by the criteria you set — income, achievement, need.
The committee decides
They see the score, record the decision with a reason. The student is notified automatically.
What you get
No more piles of paper
Paper forms, email attachments, hunting through folders — all gone.
Decisions are fair and defensible
Everyone is scored by the same criteria; the reasoning can be read years later.
The term report comes out ready
How many applied, how many approved, how much paid — one click.
Application funnel — term summary
How many applications remain at each stage. The biggest drop is at document verification; because a missing document does not void the application, the student can complete it and re-enter the funnel.
Data table
| Stage | Value |
|---|---|
| Application received | 1.240 |
| Documents verified | 968 |
| Scoring completed | 942 |
| Committee reviewed | 310 |
| Scholarship approved | 184 |
Frequently asked questions
Can we set the scoring criteria ourselves?
Yes. Your institution decides how many points each criterion carries. Once a term starts the criteria are locked, so everyone is assessed by the same rule.
Does the system make the decision itself?
No. The system scores and ranks; the committee decides. The committee must record a reason.
Can several foundations share one system?
Yes, on the enterprise plan. Each institution's data is fully separate; none can see another's applications.
What does it cost?
An annual licence per institution, tiered by the number of applications per term. Tell us roughly how many you receive and we will send a quote.
Plans
Setup and support are included in every plan. Ask for a quote for pricing. Annual license per institution, tiered by application volume.
Association
up to 250 applications per term
- Online application and document upload
- Basic scoring
- Application list export to Excel
Foundation
up to 2,000 applications per term
- Criteria-based automatic scoring
- Committee approval flow
- Payment plan management
- Committee file and term statistics
Enterprise
unlimited applications · multi-tenant
- Everything in Foundation
- Multi-tenant administration
- Custom criteria engine
- Intensified support during the application period
Technical detailsSystem map, process and architecture decisions — for technical teams
-
Foundation administrator
The term and scoring criteria are defined
Scholarship policy → Active application period
-
Student
The application is submitted with documents
Identity, income, academic documents → Application record
-
Scoring engine
Documents are verified and the score computed
Verified documents → Score and ranking
-
Committee
The decision is recorded with its reasoning
Scored list → Approved scholarship list
-
Foundation administrator
A payment plan is created and tracked
Approved scholarships → Periodic payment plan
-
The score ranks, it does not decide
The automatic score does not bind the committee; a mandatory reasoning field guarantees the decision stays auditable.
-
A missing document does not void the application
The application is saved and the student is told what is missing, preventing lost half-finished applications.
-
Criteria weights are defined per institution
Because every foundation's policy differs, the scoring engine is not fixed; income, achievement and need weights are set from the panel and become locked once the term closes.
Which tier fits you?
Tell us your user count and deployment preference, and we will work out the right tier and price together.
Request a demo